.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Thursday, April 27, 2006

Theory # 21: Relationships: It's not about love

Or at least it's not only about love.

My husband and I just watched a couple, friends of ours, break up. She wanted a baby, he didn't, and the conflict had them questioning their relationship. As he told my husband, the "spark" had gone out of their marriage and while he still loved her, he wasn't sure he was still in love with her.

Now, it's impossible to know what goes on in a marriage. Even the closest of friends can't know. Even someone living in the same house can't know. But my theory isn't directly about this particular couple--it's just inspired by and extrapolated from observation and experience.

Let's assume that a couple is truly, genuinely in love when they marry. Why, then, do some couples end up still happy 20+ years later, while others can't stand the sight of each other after 2? The answer can't always be that the unhappy couple was mistaken, that they weren't really in love. And I refuse to accept that "it just happens." Like love is some mysterious fog that comes and goes at random.

The initial attraction, yes, maybe. Some chemistry, some psychological connection happens that makes two people say "yes, this is the one out of all the other people in the world." I'm not going to try to think about the whys and wherefores of falling in love right now. I'm looking at the other end of the journey--the falling out of love.

My husband, by the way, subscribes to the mysterious fog theory. He thinks "it just happens." Which would worry me, if his actions didn't show otherwise.

I think the success or failure of a relationship is often due, not to emotion, but to action. Much is said and written about "keeping love alive," and it tends to take the form of dressing up in costumes and picking each other up in bars. That's not what I mean. I'm talking about little bitty everyday actions, that you make a choice about whether to do or not:

Kiss him goodbye in the morningorthe dog's barking--I'll go let her in and catch him later
Call her when I'll be late coming homeorit's only an hour, and besides, she's not my mother or my boss
have an actual conversationoroh, but there's a show on TV. we'll talk later
stay up and have sexorI'm too tired. How about a raincheck?
Thank him for helping out with whateverorWhy should I thank him? It's his responsibility as much as it is mine.


There are a zillion more examples, but that's the sort of thing I mean. Little things, and choosing one from the "goofus" side isn't a big deal once in a while, but it adds up, until eventually, that's all you're doing. And at that point, you start thinking that maybe the spark has gone out of the relationship.

I read an article a while ago (and I wish I could remember where, so I could cite it, and, even better, re-read it) that asserted that action => emotion, rather than the more usually held belief that emotion leads to action. That is, that acting in a loving way will ensure that you continue having loving feelings. It makes a certain amount of sense, even if it sounds rather cold-blooded.

As an example, here's a lesson I learned later than I think I should have. I learned it in relation to children, but it applies to marriage as well. When you've agreed to do something you really didn't want to do, pretend you're having fun, and after a while, it'll be true. When my daughter was small, I enjoyed playing everything with her except Barbies, and when she asked me to, I'd give in grudgingly, and keep thinking about other things I could be doing, looking at my watch, making it fairly obvious that I didn't want to be doing that. Then the light went on. What was I accomplishing by acting that way? Making both of us miserable. Punishing her for making me do something I didn't want? If I was going to do it anyway, what would I be losing by doing it cheerfully? It worked. Barbies still wasn't on my list of druthers, but we were both much happier. Note that I'm not advocating giving in on every issue, or doing things you absolutely do not want to do. But when you have already argued, negotiated, and one of you has acquiesced, the decision has been made. Live with it, cheerfully.

It works the same way with spouses, whether you're talking about an evening out, housework, sex, conversation, or the million other details of a life together. It's not love that makes me put down my book and talk politics with my husband when I'm right at a good part. It's not love that makes him call me daily whenever he's away from home even when it means standing outside a restaurant in the rain while his dinner's getting cold (he did this last night). Or at least it's not only love. It's a decision to do those little things that keep you connected, that keep you feeling in love.

Is that where our friends' marriage failed? I suspect so, though it's impossible to know. Maybe love is a mysterious fog that comes and goes unpredictably. But I doubt it.



Categories: ,

Labels: ,



garden 13



Thirteen things we grew in the garden when I was a kid:

  1. tomatoes -- I never realized until I was a teenager that you could actually BUY canned tomatoes
  2. green beans -- my mom's favorite story of my first time at summer camp: I wrote home, complaining about the food--I said they served "artificial green beans".
  3. strawberries -- ever hull a bushel of strawberries? I can still remember the feeling under my fingernails
  4. peas -- vivid memories of shelling peas. it takes a heck of a lot of pea pods to get enough peas for dinner. particularly when they taste so delicious raw.
  5. pumpkins -- another thing that boggled my mind when I saw them for sale in a grocery store.
  6. zucchini -- oddly, the only way we ever ate this when I was a child was dunked in milk & flour & then fried.
  7. corn -- not to be confused with the feed corn that grew across the road.
  8. watermelon -- which, for some reason, we generally sprinkled with salt before eating. strange.
  9. muskmelon (cantaloupe) -- no, I don't know the reason for the different name. I didn't like it--thought it was slimy. maybe it was--maybe they tended to let it get overripe. I don't know.
  10. carrots -- I had nothing to do with these--one of the few veggies we weren't tasked to pick &/or otherwise prepare.
  11. beets -- something else I was shocked to discover that you could actually buy was pickled beets. if allowed, I'd have eaten an entire quart jar of pickled beets at a time.
  12. green peppers -- loved these raw, but the seeds freaked me out a little.
  13. radishes -- these I ate by dunking into sugar. raw tomato slices also got smothered in sugar. I don't do that anymore, except on the rare occasions that I want to revisit my youth--those flavor combos will turn me into an 8-year-old in an instant.
This doesn't include the apple orchard, the pear trees or peach trees, or the grape vines. There was rhubarb and asparagus, but those grew by my grandpa's garage, not in the garden. We never grew potatoes or any kind of lettuce--I have no idea why. And there were always 4 rows of gladiolas on the west edge of the garden. No other flowers, and nowhere else.

Links to other Thursday Thirteens!
1. (leave your link in comments, I’ll add you here!)


Get the Thursday Thirteen code here!

The purpose of the meme is to get to know everyone who participates a little bit better every Thursday. Visiting fellow Thirteeners is encouraged! If you participate, leave the link to your Thirteen in others comments. It’s easy, and fun! Be sure to update your Thirteen with links that are left for you, as well! I will link to everyone who participates and leaves a link to their 13 things. Trackbacks, pings, comment links accepted!




Categories:

Labels:



Wednesday, April 26, 2006

Reader Interview

I got this from Maili.


Categories:

Labels:



Tuesday, April 25, 2006

Sgt. Pepper

Doug started this, and I don't normally respond to these things, but... well, it'll become clear when you read it. These were all really memorable dates.

20 years ago:

April, 1986. Landstuhl, Germany. Dagny was 8 months old. We'd bought her a dirndl for her Easter dress. Seriously adorable, though the pix of the time (they're in the States, or I'd post some) have steri-strips on her cheeks, because this is also the month when she had surgery to remove the skin tags she'd been born with (she had a relatively mild form of Goldenhar syndrome). Pretty darn stressful to take your 8-month-old in for surgery, and then to have it last for 3 hours instead of the projected 30 minutes because there was more cartilage than expected. Her personality was pretty evident, though, when we were told that the anesthesia would probably make her sleep the rest of the day, and she didn't sleep at all.

This was also the only year we went to church for Easter, the same church where I was an assistant aerobics teacher.

10 years ago:

April 1996. Grafenwöhr Seybothenreuth, Germany. Dagny's 10, Curran's 5, Camden's 18 months. Carl's been in Bosnia for 4 months. I'm a wee bit stressed. We live in a teeny village in northern Bavaria 22 miles from post. I drive in to post twice a week to collect mail and do shopping (teeny village, remember? the only store was a post office/convenience store), and every time we make the trip, Camden throws up in his car seat. Except for the one memorable time he waited until he was in the backpack, on my back, and we were inside the commissary, then he threw up in my hair and down my back. That was fun. On the plus side, Carl being a commander meant he had a phone. I didn't sleep a whole lot, what with the 2-hour phone calls every night.

But the hospital commander's wife was a goddess, and arranged a spouses' trip to Budapest. Overnight bus trip, and we met in the lobby of the Budapest Hilton. O. M. G. Yes, we'd been married for nearly 12 years at this point, but I was literally shaking. We missed the hotel breakfast both mornings, made some interesting videos, though we only got a couple shots of the city.

5 years ago:

April, 2001. San Antonio, Texas. I'm in the middle of the round of doctor's appointments that eventually tell me I've got chronic fatigue syndrome. In April, I think I saw the cardiologist and the neurologist. Maybe the rheumatologist as well. Lots of appointments--it got to be a bit of a blur. In the meanwhile, from the worry and the lack of any inkling of how to handle it, the CFS was the worst it's ever been. Carl gets promoted to lieutenant colonel and 15-year-old Dagny stands in for me because I can't attend. My friend Karen drives down from Dallas, bringing me autographed books because I've announced that I won't be able to make it to TTP this year.

1 year ago:

Well, this is when I sent my daughter to Rolling Oaks mall to get Hunter's Moon signed by C. T. Adams and Cathy Clamp. And Camden (10 at the time) bought himself a moose hat at the Auto-Technik museum and wore it everywhere.

1 month ago:

Well, Camden finally got his soda-drinking hat (known to most people as a beer-drinking hat, but even though we're in Germany, we don't encourage this for 11-year-olds) at the Auto-Technik museum, and was promptly disillusioned, despite having wanted one for years. A cold and a stomach bug in March plopped me back into a relapse, so I didn't do much last month.

Yesterday:

Sunny, WARM day, hung laundry outside (one load is still out there, despite the rain--I suppose I'll have to give up and bring it in).

Curran (15) came home with a whopping case of teen angst. Spent over an hour talking about Life, the Universe, and Everything (no, not the book, unfortunately). Finally, after much sage advice and lots of hugs, I sent him out to walk with the dog, because neither one of us was going to be able to take it much longer.

Watched part of the Harry Potter DVD with the kids, and was just about ready to call it a night when Carl decided he ought to connect the new printer! before leaving for Belgium (he left at noon today, then was back at 12:30 for his passport and international driver's license *rolling my eyes*). Who knew connecting a printer required disabling the mouse? And who'd ever figure that an engineer wouldn't be able to figure out that the reason that first the printer and then the mouse weren't working was that they weren't plugged in? *sigh* But I've got a new printer, and I can be the Mean And Rotten Mommy Monster for 4 days, so life is tolerable.

Tomorrow:

With any luck, I'll be the excessively organized person I try to be whenever Carl's gone, so nothing falls through the cracks. Wish me luck.

In the next minute I am tagging . . .

McNab. Sending this to Annie & Julia for a QOTD (question of the day).


Categories: ,

Labels:



Sunday, April 23, 2006

April TBR Challenge

The TBR Challenge for April:

In honor of April Fool's Day, choose a book with a joke or pun in the title.

My challenge: Going Postal by the incomparable Terry Pratchett. What can I say about this book? It is, like all Pratchett's books, amazing. As you can no doubt surmise from the title, it's about the post office. Vetinari [pause for a moment here to drool over Vetinari's oh-so-twisted brain] hires a con artist fresh from the gallows to revive the post office. There's romance and equal rights and ethics and character growth and so much humor he's got you thinking before you even realize it. It's still a little disconcerting to have chapters in a Discworld book, but he has fun with them: I caught the progression of chapters 7, 7a, 9, but I wouldn't be surprised if there were more. These are books you've got to read more than once.

A couple of people suggested this was a difficult challenge to meet. It must say something about different reading tastes, because I've read several books this month that would meet the challenge. They were already at the top of the stack, though, so I took advantage of the challenge to read one I've been dying to read. Plus, I'd just finished reading Crusie & Mayer's Don't Look Down, and I wanted to read another excellent book afterwards so as not to lose the good-book-high.

The other books I've read this month that qualify:
  • Ex and the Single Girl by Lani Diane Rich
  • Hot Ice by Nora Roberts
  • Sweet Myth-Tery of Life by Robert Asprin
  • novellas from Dead and Loving It by MaryJanice Davidson:
    • "Santa Claws"
    • "Monster Love"
    • "A Fiend in Need"
  • In the Thrill of the Night by Candice Hern
  • Cruel and Unusual Puns by Don Hauptman
  • Don't Look Down by Jennifer Crusie and Bob Mayer. This one's a pun on a few levels. The most amusing is the story about how they got the title: Jenny always calls the first draft of a book, the one in which you just write, and don't worry about rules or character arcs or beats or symbolism or anything the "don't look down draft." When they first started the book, Jenny sent Bob the file with her first scene in it, with the title on the file "don't look down draft," which became "the draft of Don't Look Down." The things you learn by being a Cherry.
I'm sure there'll be more. It's a factor of publishers liking catchy, pun-ny titles, and me liking humor in my reading.



Categories:

Labels: ,



Friday, April 21, 2006

Theory # 20: Routines

I suspect it's a personality trait, hardwired into the brain, but I think it can also be learned.

Carl just came back to the house, 15 minutes after he'd left, because he'd forgotten his wallet, making him unable to get in the gate, which made him late for a meeting. He was understandably angry with himself, and blamed the headache he'd woken up with, but this sort of thing happens at least once every week or two.

All he has to remember is
  • hat
  • watch
  • wallet
  • cell phone
  • keys--and since he can't leave without them, this one doesn't really count
In contrast, in the mornings, I remember
  • assortment of vitamins for everyone
  • coffee (hah! like I'd forget that one)
  • what I'd planned for breakfast--the main dish, fruit, and milk
  • to let the dog out
  • clearing off the table
  • homework
  • lunches
  • water bottles
  • to sign Cam's agenda
  • any notes/permission slips/money the kids need
  • jackets
  • shoes
  • backpacks
It's extremely rare that I forget anything, but that's not because my memory's particularly good--it's like a sieve half the time. It's because I've developed a routine. I do everything in the same order in the mornings, and nothing gets left out. The couple of times a year that I forget something are invariably because something's happened to upset the routine.

So why, I ask Carl on the occasions like today when he forgets something and it screws up his whole day, doesn't he just make it an automatic routine? (I'm not known for tact.) Why not just every morning, when he's ready to leave, put on his watch, put his wallet in his pocket, clip the phone to his belt, grab his hat and his keys, and go out the door? What could be simpler? Instead, he has to actively think about each item. You can see it. He'll reach in the drawer for his watch and put it on, then look around, grab the hat from the table by the door, then go back in the drawer for the wallet, back over by the door for the keys, then get the cell phone from on top of the radio. It's in a different order every time, and he has to think about it, has to remember each item.

Perhaps it's because I have so many things to remember, and because the consequences of forgetfulness fall on people I love rather than on myself that I'm more motivated to make certain that I don't forget.

But I do think I have a predisposition to routine. I use routines all the time. In fact, it's sometimes a challenge to shake things up a bit. The routines do free my mind from having to consciously think about mundane tasks, but I have to be aware of them getting in the way of things I want or need to do.

Can Carl learn to make those 4 items an automatic routine? I'm convinced it's possible. Will he? Probably not. He doesn't have the routine gene, and the consequences would have to be much greater than they are at present to motivate him enough to remember.


...read more

Categories:

Labels:



Thursday, April 20, 2006

13 websites


Thirteen Places I visit online daily


  1. Yahoo! to get part of my email, and add to my reading journal.
  2. Gmail to get the rest of my email.
  3. Berkley/Jove Authors Forums 'cause I'm more or less in charge, and they pay me in books.
  4. NAL Authors Forums. Ditto.
  5. Story Code to code the previous day's book.
  6. Pen and Sword for the politics, & 'cause it's got a military slant. I like that.
  7. Smart Bitches--gotta keep on top of that mantitty. No, not like that.
  8. Tod Goldberg ('s blog)--to keep abreast of all the fucktards out there
  9. Proceed at Your Own Risk--for the politics and the eye candy (no, not for me--I collect the links & send them to people on their birthdays...not that anyone believes me)
  10. The Unfeasible Adventures of Beaver and Steve
  11. Balls & Walnuts--politics, recipes, arachnids & amphibians
  12. He Wrote/She Wrote--because it's important to laugh aloud at least once a day
  13. Cherry Forums--where my moniker is Bimbo Cherry. I think that explains it all, really.

Yeesh. There are more. I'm thinking maybe I should cut back a bit, huh? Or maybe I should do this over, separating blogs & other things. Or maybe I'll just leave it like this because I'm at a loss this week and it's amazing I remembered at all. Yeah, that's the option I'm picking.

Links to other Thursday Thirteens!
1. (leave your link in comments, I’ll add you here!)



Get the Thursday Thirteen code here!


The purpose of the meme is to get to know everyone who participates a little bit better every Thursday. Visiting fellow Thirteeners is encouraged! If you participate, leave the link to your Thirteen in others comments. It’s easy, and fun! Be sure to update your Thirteen with links that are left for you, as well! I will link to everyone who participates and leaves a link to their 13 things. Trackbacks, pings, comment links accepted!





Categories:

Labels:



Tuesday, April 04, 2006

Theory # 19: Relationships: Ex and the Single Girl

I had this brainstorm when reading Ex and the Single Girl by Lani Diane Rich. You don't have to have read the book to follow the theory, but it's a good book. Read it anyway. :)

the theory:
Anyway, Portia realizes that she's unconsciously sabotaged her previous relationship by making her ex feel like a failure. And the reason she did this was that she wasn't in love, thought she ought to be, because he was "perfect", and so she drove him away so it would be his fault it didn't work out, not hers.

That may be true, but I think there's another factor at work here, too. I recognize it, because I've done it myself. (See primarily Boyfriend v.3.0) I think she subconsciously made Peter feel like a failure because she wanted him to prove that he wasn't, or, and even more importantly, that he was confident enough that her subtle (and it was subtle--at a casual glance, she looked supportive) criticism couldn't undermine his sense of self-worth.

She wanted him to be strong enough not to need her approval and respect; strong enough to command it.

She was testing him, and he failed.

She did the same thing with Ian--the little sneer of the academic for genre fiction--but Ian passed the test.

Granted, it's not a very nice, kind, or attractive thing to do, but while it was deliberate, it wasn't consciously deliberate.

I think that it's a common, if not universal, need among women to find a man they can respect. Different women will find different traits respectable; will value various traits differently, but we're all (mostly) looking for someone we can respect. And I think we all (some of us, most of us), usually subconsciously, test the men we date. It's the courtship process.

I suspect that a lot of relationship problems come from ignoring those subconscious test grades.

Which is not to say that women are in sole control of relationships--not being male, I have no idea if men do the same thing or not. I'll have to ask my resident expert what he thinks and get back to you.



Categories: ,

Labels: ,



Monday, April 03, 2006

March 2006 Books

MARCH BOOKS

I've noticed a distinct increase in the average number of stars my reading has gotten lately. I think the reason is that there are fewer and fewer books in my TBR pile that I haven't deliberately chosen because I really want to read them. The books that were flea market purchases just to try out an author are dwindling in number, and even with the recent package from NAL, there still aren't as many wild cards in the mix.

Perversely, I'm starting to miss that, and I'm starting to worry that I'll get stale, reading only things I want to read.

the list:
  1. ***** Dead Heat by Jacey Ford. Romantic suspense. I knew I was going to like this one. Interesting, though--it's not easy to like a protagonist who's depressed, and Daphne is depressed, cutting herself off from emotions and life after 9/11--she's a former FBI agent & feels guilty for not preventing it. Overlapping, interwoven plot threads have Daphne following a woman whose boyfriend suspects her of infidelity to a business called Rules of Engagement, a counseling service that claims to show women how to get the men in their lives to propose. She meets the son of the owner and breaks all the rules, and a simple, boring assignment turns into an investigation of murder, possible terrorism, and leads her to a man who can understand and help her heal. Dense, emotional, exciting--all things I've come to expect from this author.

  2. ***** The Darkest Hours: A Spider-Man Novel by Jim Butcher. Superhero action/adventure. Spidey learns teamwork. Can't give anything away, but I trust nobody's surprised I gave this one 5 stars. I'm sure you can hear the fangirly squeeing from here. :)

  3. ***** Son of Avonar by Carol Berg. Fantasy. Not as intense as her Transformation trilogy, but emotional, dense fantasy that really sucks you into the world. I love this woman's writing.

  4. ***** No Regrets by Shannon K. Butcher. Romantic suspense. Can't give anything away, but it has a brainy heroine and an alpha hero and it's obvious Jim's not the only talent in that house.

  5. ****½ Memory in Death by J. D. Robb. Futuristic romantic suspense. Very good. I've been expecting a story like this one for a long time. Loved Eve's growth as a wife and a friend. Loved Peabody & McNab's crisis & how Eve ended up helping. Solid story. I knew whodunit nearly from the moment they were introduced--guess Eve's gut instinct came through on the page.

  6. ** Free Spirit by Penny Jordan. Contemporary romance. Back story up the wazoo. It made my eyes cross. If there were a scene where someone knocks on the door, there'd be pages & pages of descriptions of the door, other doors the heroine has seen, other people who've knocked at the door, their histories and how the heroine felt about them, speculations about who might possibly be at the door now, a side trip to what the heroine ate for breakfast three days ago, what she's wearing, the other occasions on which she wore this outfit, and what she thinks about the political ramifications of this type of outfit, and a discussion of how she doesn't want anything to get in the way of her being a career woman before she opens the door. Between the knock and opening the door will be possibly 3 or 4 chapters. If you got rid of all the extraneous stuff, this book might be 10 pages long. And on those 10 pages, 4 would be devoted to the heroine jumping to conclusions, 5 would be devoted to reminding us of her absolute dedication to her career, and 1 would be the romance. This was written in 1989, so some of that might be the prevailing style at the time (and why I didn't like romance when I tried it then). But in 1989, I was 28 years old--older than the heroine is. And the idea of an employer who gave the "girls" in the office and extra half hour off a week so they could get their hair done... maybe 1969, not 1989.


  7. **** Duchess of Fifth Avenue by Ruth Ryan Langan. American historical romance. Hmm. Just setting up the premise takes an awful lot of time. Suffice it to say that the heroine decides to pose as English nobility in order to secure guardianship of the child of a friend who's died, and to accomplish that, she gives her savings to a man she met first playing poker in a cheap tavern and later in the house of her wealthy employers being introduced as an English duke. A bit of a My Fair Lady flavor, though she's the one who instigates the transformation, and a nice twist that I initially suspected, then decided I was wrong.

  8. **** Ransom by Julie Garwood. Historical romance. I read this while I was really, really sick, so my first complaint is that the book (I have the hardcover) was WAY too heavy. LOL But that does lead me to an actual complaint--it was a good story, but it dragged on too long, and got repetitious in spots. I loved the interaction between the h/h, but they had the same argument with nothing resolved too many times--I accept that people do this in real life, but in a book, showing it to the readers once should do the trick. It was also two romances in one, and the two stories weren't well intertwined. Although we're told that the two heroes were friends, and we see the two heroines become friends, there's not much interaction between the pairs. My other complaint is that, oddly though it seems from my complaint that the book was too long, there was a lot left out. For example, we jump from the heroine's escape to someone informing the hero's men that his bride has arrived. It yanked me out of the story for a page or two while I surmised that that must have been the heroine's plan to enlist his aid, though why or how she came up with that plan is never explained, and since the rest of the story hinges on that, it's a real weak spot. That's not the only time I felt that way, either. It's obviously a sequel, because when several characters were introduced, I swear I could read "pause for applause" between the lines. Complaints out of the way, it was a good story. A little too complex to easily sum up here, but the main heroine is strong and brave and honorable and never once disguises herself as a boy, and the hero just makes me grin. Clueless, gruff, and--get this!--he falls in love with her because he's impressed with her, not because she's "the most beeeyouteeful woman he's ever seen." For that, I'll forgive a book a lot. Like her sister, who just disgusted me no end--I couldn't believe they shared genes. The secondary story was cute but predictable, and could have been developed better, IMO.


  9. ****½ The Tiara Club by Beverly Brandt. Chick lit. Beverly Brandt = Jacey Ford, in case you didn't know. This one's All About Secrets. Heroine Georgia is an ex-beauty queen and secret inventor. She and her friends call each other the Tiara Club, as they're all veterans of the beauty contest circuit--all except one. On the day everything changes, Daniel, the host of a TV cooking show reads a letter from Georgia's friend Callie praising the Miracle Chef and he announces a cook-off to test it. The problem is, Georgia invented the Miracle Chef and the reason why nobody can find another is that Georgia only had two made--one for herself and one for Callie. When Daniel shows up on her doorstep wanting to speak to the inventor, the fabric of all their lives starts unraveling. It's funny and poignant, examining family and friendships, and asking the question whether secrets keep people apart or allow them to remain friends. Oh, and there's a nice, steamy romance, too. My only complaint is that I had a hard time swallowing the mother's rationalization.

  10. ****½ Kushiel's Dart by Jacqueline Carey. Fantasy. This is the kind of fantasy I like, with tons of intrigue and behind-the-scenes machinations. Swords & quests & dragons & elves don't interest me nearly as much. It's been in my TBR pile for a very long while. Partly because it's a big fat doorstop of a book, and partly because of all the raves surrounding it. Since mostly everyone focused on the erotic aspects, I was expecting something like LKH's Anita-Does-Everyone books. It wasn't. At all. The heroine is a born masochist (which is what "Kushiel's Dart" refers to--she was born with a red speck in her eye, the sign of someone for whom pain = pleasure), and a trained spy. I docked it a half star because the story meandered around for the first quarter of the book (and at 900+ pages, a quarter is a lot) before it settled down into something coherent, and several times I was tempted to put it down. Books like this are a major reason why I don't quit reading if I don't like a book at first. I'm hoping that now that the character's introduced, and Carey has some more experience, the sequel won't have the same problem.

  11. ** A New Leaf by Thomas Kinkade & Katherine Spencer. General fiction. I actually read this last month, just forgot to put it in the list. Which kind of tells you something about the book--very forgettable. Not unlike Thomas Kinkade's painting, IMO. This is the 4th book in the series about the town of Cape Light (geddit? Cape Light?), so I was missing some things about what had happened in previous books. This one--I haven't read the others, nor will I, so I don't know if they have similar themes--is About Second Chances. Two main story threads--a bitter divorced mom and the new doctor in town (who's moved, by the way, to give his daughter a second chance--she has a "horrible" stuttering problem which seems to be nonexistent except in his mind), and a long-lost black-sheep brother who comes home. And there was a man who dies and his widow wants to keep their orchard. The stories were uninspired, the characters cardboard cut-outs, and the resolutions of the problems too easy and sugar-sweet--all it takes is a little chat with saintly Reverend Ben. *gag*

  12. **** Night's Kiss by Amanda Ashley. Contemporary paranormal romance. This is my TBR challenge book. Nice fluff, combining vampires and time travel and witches.

  13. ***** The Sea Hunters by Clive Cussler & Craig Dirgo. Non-fiction. Fascinating accounts of shipwrecks and how NUMA discovered them. Very readable, with just enough detail to make it interesting, not enough detail to get you bogged down in trivialities.

  14. ** Jordan by Lori Foster. Contemporary romance. Hopefully this is the last Foster in my TBR pile. Two-dimensional characters, over-dramatic, unbelievable situations, and the stereotypical heroine who hates all men that I thought had gone out of fashion in the 80s. Its only saving grace was that it was short.

  15. ***** Of Saints and Shadows by Christopher Golden. Contemporary fantasy. What if vampires weren't necessarily evil--they've only been brainwashed to think they are? And what if all their traditional weaknesses: sunlight, holy water, crosses, aren't actually weaknesses at all, but also the result of brainwashing? What if they're even more powerful than they realize, but the Church has used superstition to keep these Defiant Ones under control? That's the premise of Of Saints and Shadows, as it follows renegade vampire Peter Octavian on his search for the truth and his efforts to save his fellow vampires on the eve of the Blessed Event, when the Vatican's secret army intends to wipe out the Defiant Ones once and for all. Excellent story. I'll be getting the sequel.

  16. ***** "Ian" in The MacGregor Grooms by Nora Roberts. Contemporary romance. This one is About how what someone is thinking and what you think they're thinking can be vastly different things. Well, not completely, but it's certainly a theme throughout the story. (note: I read the previous two stories in this anthology last month)

  17. **** Involuntary Daddy by Rachel Lee. Contemporary romance. Really pretty good story about two people whose lives have been turned upside-down and inside-out. He's an undercover DEA agent who only finds out that his tryst with a drug supplier's sister resulted in pregnancy when he's presented with a baby whose mother's dying wish was that he take care of the child. She's a burned-out bank loan officer with out-of-control diabetes exacerbated by the stress of her job. They both end up living at the same friends' home. It was a pretty realistic portrayal of two people at the end of their ropes, struggling to make some sense of their lives, unable to trust or let someone else in. I got a bit impatient with them toward the end of the book, and they did seem to stay at the friends' house way too long, but other than that, it was a good story.

  18. **** Summer Breeze by Catherine Anderson. American historical romance. A prequel to her contemporary Coulter family stories, and very much in the same style. This time the heroine is agoraphobic. As usual, she presents the disabled character with realism and affection. Rachel has been barricaded inside her kitchen for 5 years, since barely surviving the massacre of her family, aided only by her laconic ranch hand Darby. When Darby is shot in the back and suspects the killer has returned, he enlists Joseph, a neighboring rancher, to watch over Rachel. The townspeople are a little too sweet and everyone's just a little too understanding of her need for walls and security, particularly in a time when psychology was not common knowledge.

  19. **** Micah by Laurell K. Hamilton. Contemporary fantasy. Yes, I'm surprised by the 4 stars, too. Particularly after reading Mrs. Giggles' review, I expected more of the same dreck we've been getting from LKH for the past several books. And there was still some of that tone of juvenile snickering about sex which gets on my last nerve, and some of her way-over-used phrases (spill, frex). But the angst is considerably reduced, and Anita's actually doing her job instead of bed-hopping. The POTM* escalation didn't bug me, because that's been happening all along in the series. I'll still never like Micah--I absolutely cannot stand a yes-man. Seriously, something about the whole concept just creeps me out, and makes me want to hurt them. I suppose I can accept that that's what Anita wants--or maybe I'm just so relieved she's not whining about it that I don't care anymore. Anyway. I do understand the people who felt cheated for paying $8 for a novella, but I bought it used, and I'd already been warned about the length. So I'll get the next book. Not the new, full-price hardcover, but I'll get it. Maybe used again, or maybe from Zooba.
    * POTM = Power of the Month--a frequent complaint on the LKH email list, referring to Anita's habit of exhibiting new powers suddenly and inexplicably.

  20. ****½ Goddess by Mistake by P.C. Cast. Contemporary paranormal romance. Her first book. Wonderful story about an Oklahoma high school teacher who ends up changing places with Rhiannon, the high priestess of the goddess Epona, just in time for her political marriage to a centaur, an epidemic of smallpox, and a war against an army of vampire-like creatures. Fun stuff.

  21. ***½ The Heart's Victory by Nora Roberts. Contemporary romance. It's an old book, and it shows, but it's actually one of the better books of her very oldest ones. Some nice characterization with Foxy & her brother--his dedication to racing, her dedication to him, despite the terror his racing induced in her. Lance is a nice guy, but a pretty typical paternalistic hero of the genre at that time. I didn't get what the rush was for them to get married--Lance does at least try to explain near the very end. And Lance's mother was a 2-dimensional motivationless stock character. Add to that the near-rape Lance used to shut Foxy up in an argument, and the fact that I cringed every time I read her name (WTF was Nora thinking? FOXY? I've gotta say, I actually agreed with Lance's mother when she first heard the name. It sounds like a name for a sleazy stripper in a cheap strip joint in 1975.)

  22. ***** Practical Demonkeeping by Christopher Moore. Contemporary fantasy. Oh, what fun. Now I see why everyone keeps recommending him. A demon, a genie, a witch, & star-crossed lovers all converge in a small town with hilarious and unpredictable results. Between the story and the voice, I can't decide which I like better. Just perfect.

  23. **** The Rogue's Return by Jo Beverley. Historical romance. Speaking of unusual settings--most of this historical takes place in Canada. I think the only other time I've seen that is when Sara Donati's characters were traveling through Canada. In the Rogues series, Simon has been in Canada in search of adventure, and finds it--he's in the middle of a duel instigated because he accused a man of corruption, when Jane, the niece of the friend with whom he's been residing, interrupts, saying that her uncle is dying. Uncle Isaiah, on his deathbed, begs the two to wed, for his niece's protection. Unfortunately, Jane isn't really Jane--she's her illegitimate sister Nan, also known as Jancy. They plan to settle Isaiah's estate, then return to England, but there's the matter of the aborted duel and the associated corruption, the secret hanging over Jancy's head, and the impending death of Simon's uncle and cousin, putting him unexpectedly in line for an earldom. Lots of romance and adventure, and a really nice portrayal of how keeping a big secret (Jancy's true identity) can eat at you.

  24. ***½ You Only Love Once by Tori Carrington. Contemporary romance. This is obviously part of a series--no doubt I'd have liked it better if I'd been acquainted with the other characters. Take out all the obscure references to previous books, though, and it would have been a solid 4-star story. H/h meet in a bar & have a one-night stand--she's just back in D.C. & feeling reckless. The next morning, they discover they're new partners on the metro P.D. And that their fathers loathe each other (Hatfield & McCoy--literally: that's their names). Some back & forth, with the heroine doing that thing that bugs me so much: they argue, they (seemingly) resolve the argument, then the next day, they have the identical argument. Again. And again. I know people do this in real life--I don't like it any better in fiction. :) But the characters are engaging, and it's a cute story.

  25. Bump in the Night.

    ****½ "Haunted in Death" by J. D. Robb. Futuristic paranormal romantic suspense. I'm not sure how I feel about the introduction of a ghost into the series. It feels a bit like the magical healing in Ceremony in Death, but not quite as intrusive. I think how you feel about the introduction of paranormal elements into a series (or book) that's otherwise not paranormal, depends on whether you think those things do exist in real life. I'll buy the psychic in Visions in Death, but while I think there is something to psychic healing, I don't think it takes the form of magically making injuries disappear. The same with ghosts--I'll buy a feeling, and maybe a sighting, but not the elaborate production the ghost put on here. I thought Eve's reaction was exactly right, thought the killer's motivation was idiotic, Roarke was his usual credulous self, and Peabody was star-struck, also as usual.

    *** "Poppy's Coin" by Mary Blayney. Historical romance. Pretty standard story about a magic coin that grants the holder one wish. Hero's a major who was at Waterloo, guardian of two young children, no way to support them until he sells his commission, which is hard to do now that the war's mostly over. He wishes for lucrative & enjoyable employment, and the heroine, a well-off widow, hires him to be her escort. Entirely predictable, but not horrible.

    **** "The Passenger" by Ruth Ryan Langan. Contemporary romance. You could call it paranormal, I suppose, since a ghost/guardian angel brought the h/h together, and there was some time distortion, but that was only on the periphery of the story about two loners/adventurers who find each other in the wilderness.

    ***½ "Mellow Lemon Yellow" by Mary Kay McComas. Women's fiction. I'm not going to call this romance because, while the heroine does get married at the end, we don't see her falling in love. What we do see is her changing her life with the help of her childhood imaginary friend, a product of her imagination. "Mel" seemed to waffle between being an independent person and being only what she imagined, consciously or subconsciously. If I tried to think about it too much, it just got confusing. Pretty standard story of a woman changing her life and getting a HEA as a result.

  26. *****+ Pawn in Frankincense by Dorothy Dunnett. Historical fiction. Just. Could. Not. Put. It. Down. Lump in my throat the whole time, edge of my seat. This one's a lot more personal than the previous books, with Lymond trying to rescue his son from Gabriel. Could Gabriel be any more evil? I don't think so. And O. M. G. I can't believe she DID that!! (If you've read the book, you'll instantly know what I mean. If you haven't, there's no way I'm going to spoil it.) Loved Philippa. Seriously intrigued by Marthe. *whew* Exhausting book.

  27. ***** Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams. Science fiction. Read this to the boys over breakfast last month and forgot to add it to the list. Still just as much fun, if not more, than the first time I read it.

  28. ***** The Restaurant at the End of the Universe by Douglas Adams. Science fiction. Second of the series, again a breakfast read-aloud. It's a great start to the day if you've got the kids not only laughing but discussing complex stuff. Camden's using a page from this for his read-aloud assignment in school. He's practiced enough so he doesn't burst into laughter in the middle of it, though he can't quite keep from grinning.

  29. **** Dark Demon by Christine Feehan. Contemporary paranormal romance. A true guilty pleasure. In this one, the heroine is part Carpathian, and a mage, and can turn herself into a tiger. She knows about Carpathians, but Carpathian hunters killed her brother, so when a hunter announces she's his lifemate, she's not particularly enthused by the idea. Intriguing mystery re: what really happened to her brother, and her grandfather, with missing memories. And what I really, really liked about this was how Vik not only accepted her strength and ability, but loved it. He's still got the instinctual imperative to keep her safe, but it doesn't keep him from feeling exhilarated fighting at her side.

  30. *****+ Flowers from the Storm by Laura Kinsale. Historical romance. I'm a little hesitant to read this so recently after Dunnett, but it was on the top of the TBR pile, where it got in a perfectly fair and random manner. If my head explodes from too much exceptional writing.... It's either an insult to call this "just" a historical romance, or it elevates the whole genre. A duke who has a stroke and a Quaker spinster. Could they be any more unsuited? Kinsale has a knack for really, really getting you deep into the characters' heads. The intensity just doesn't let up, and there aren't any easy answers.

  31. ***** The Perfect Neighbor by Nora Roberts. Contemporary romance. Re-read. This one, IMO, was just right. Nice characterization, light, quick read. Shades of Cybil's parents' romance, but not as exaggerated. In fact, Cybil realizes at one point that Preston reminds her of her father, which is a nice bit of characterization there--women do frequently fall in love with men who remind them of their fathers.

  32. ***** Thief of Lives by Barb & J.C. Hendee. Fantasy. Sequel to Dhampir, and in the way all good series do, it didn't just repeat the same story, but rather expanded on it. Some nice emotional stuff between Magiere and Leesil, very realistic. Resolution of things left hanging from the previous book, new developments and intrigue, and some things left hanging for the next book. I couldn't ask for more.

  33. *** Bon Bon Voyage by Nancy Fairbanks. Mystery. Have I mentioned how much I don't like mysteries with gimmicks? I should also mention that I don't like books with inconsistent characterization. Why would a woman who's a staunch feminist blame another woman when a man makes a pass at her? And why would that same feminist continually tell this other woman (and not in a sarcastic manner) that she shouldn't do something because her husband wouldn't like it? Gah. Also, it bounced around between 3 different first-person POV characters, as well as sections written in 3rd person from the POVs of the villains. And then there were the sterotypical & cliched accents and two-dimensional stock characters. This wasn't so much a mystery as it was an adventure--we always know whodunit and why and how. The heroine/sleuth is a food writer, taking a free cruise so she can write about the food, and she has her friend (cue stereotypes: hispanic ex-cop) and mother-in-law (the pseudo-feminist) along. The cruise ship gets hijacked, and she saves the day, with the help of various passengers and members of the crew. So why three stars? It did get entertaining, particularly toward the end.

  34. **** Night Rhythms by Elda Minger. Contemporary romance. Overdone, but you can see the bones of a good story here. Quibbles first: as I said, it's overdone, and needs a good editing. Or maybe a ham-handed editor is responsible for this. Ice cream isn't just ice cream, it's a "cool dessert" (no, I'm not getting over that one any time soon). It sounds as if I'm dissing the whole book based on one phrase, but I'm not--that's just the best example of how the whole book is. There's a great story there, but for me, it kind of got lost under an avalanche of superfluous adjectives, adverbs, and descriptive passages. The story, though, was excellent. It's a reunion story, which you know I love anyway, and there are twists. Outsider returns to small town for her high school reunion where everyone thinks she's a huge success because of some embellishment from her friends. She's an author, sold her first book, but hasn't been able to sell another. So she encounters a whole host of reactions: from excitement and pride to envy and resentment. And there's the man she came back for: a rancher, whose life has been taking care of the ranch and his younger brothers and his psychologically ill mother after his father died. Both of them are harboring feelings for each other from the past, and both of them are afraid they're not good enough for the other and don't want to tie them down/cause them pain. This book's from 1997, and it's easy to see how a few years later she's become such a good author. I have her latest in my TBR pile.

  35. **½ The Instant When Everything Is Perfect by Jessica Barksdale Inclan. Women's fiction. Written in third person present, which is disconcerting. The plot is the same as 90% of women's fiction: 40-something heroine in a boring marriage whose mother has cancer. The answer to all her problems, of course, is a divorce and a new man, not necessarily in that order. I freely admit that the low score on this one is due primarily to my dislike of the genre, the characters, and the style--that is, it's more a matter of personal taste than the quality of the writing.



Categories: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Labels:



This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?